History Vizier piece from a Southern Italian chess set, 12th century One of the most widely known examples of this was in the game Anderssen–Kieseritzky, 1851, where Anderssen sacrificed a queen (along with three other pieces) to reach checkmate. rook and king is also a win for the player with the queen, but it is not easy.Ī queen sacrifice is the deliberate sacrifice of a queen in order to gain a more favorable tactical position. lone king is an easy win when compared to some other basic mates. As the queen has the largest range and mobility, queen and king vs.

A common goal in the endgame is to promote a pawn to a queen. Ī queen exchange often marks the beginning of the endgame, but there are queen endgames, and sometimes queens are exchanged in the opening, long before the endgame. The Danvers Opening (1.e4 e5 2.Qh5), which is widely characterized as a beginner's opening, has occasionally been played by the American grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura.

Some less common examples have also been observed in high-level games. For example, the Scandinavian Defense (1.e4 d5), which often features queen moves by Black on the second and third moves, is considered sound and has been played at the world championship level. Despite this, beginners often develop the queen early in the game, hoping to plunder the enemy position and deliver an early checkmate, such as the scholar's mate.Įarly queen attacks are rare in high-level chess, but there are some openings with early queen development that are used by high-level players. rooks and bishops), the queen is less restricted and stronger in closed positions.Ī player should generally delay developing the queen, as developing it too quickly can expose it to attacks by enemy pieces, causing the player to lose time removing the queen from danger. Compared to other long range pieces (i.e. Because of its long range and ability to move in multiple directions, the queen is well-equipped to execute forks. The queen is strongest when the board is open, the enemy king is poorly defended, or there are loose (i.e. However, experience has shown that this factor is usually less significant than the points favoring the queen. A factor in favor of the rook and bishop is that they can attack (or defend) a square twice, while a queen can only do so once. Second, unlike the bishop, the queen is not hampered by an inability to control squares of the opposite color to the square on which it stands.

First, the queen is more mobile than the rook and the bishop, as the entire power of the queen can be transferred to another location in one move, while transferring the entire firepower of a rook and bishop requires two moves, the bishop always being restricted to squares of one color. The reason that the queen is stronger than a combination of a rook and bishop, even though they control the same number of squares, is twofold. It is almost always disadvantageous to exchange the queen for a single piece other than the enemy's queen. The queen is typically worth about nine pawns, which is slightly stronger than a rook and a bishop together, but slightly weaker than two rooks, though there are exceptions. Further information: Chess piece relative value

Chess pieces names in spanish